In the article, through the prism of the analysis of changes in the goals and objectives set by Ukrainian scientists during the 2000s – 2010s when studying the problem of biodiversity conservation, a connection is established between the results of such studies and the scientists' awareness of the genesis of this process in the projection on future. For this purpose, the following are used: problem-chronological, diachronic and synchronic methods, systemic and multifactorial analysis of the raised issue. Taking into account the specifics of agricultural production, biodiversity in it is currently considered by Ukrainian scientists as a threefold factor, which combines: an approach to overcoming the negative consequences of the ecological situation; ways of solving the challenges of the food problem; variants of contours of an acceptable future in the field of agricultural use of natural resources. Establishing such an approach made it possible to formulate the problem of agrobiodiversity preservation at the theoretical level from the standpoint of a new science – diversicology. Two main stages can be distinguished in its development, which are related to the contribution of domestic researchers. The first stage is «establishment», which is characterized by: awareness of the prospects for the use, preservation and reproduction of agrobiodiversity; development of methodological tools for its assessment (criteria, indicators, indices, examples, etc.), management of specific situations, coordination with socio-economic projects; instrumental detection of the connection between the state of agrobiodiversity and the features of the formation of the agrosphere. The second stage is «development», which includes: understanding the potential of the agricultural sector in the «full world»; recognition of the crucial role of biodiversity in the structure of basic relations; establishing a connection between ecological and economic changes and socio-cultural priorities. The state of modern domestic agricultural science orients researchers and practitioners to strategies of relentless development. Such strategies make it possible to significantly slow down the movement towards the «red lines» of the ecological imperative, but not to stop it. The concept of biodiversity reveals the meaning of noospheric-agrarian perspectives, that is, it allows us to consider them as a complex phenomenon, which includes: tireless trends in the development of the agrosphere; the potential of agrarian thinking; transformation of algorithms of activity into a paradigm of agrarian affairs, the qualitative result of the combination of which is the formation of a culture of resonant agriculture.

1. Annienkov, I. O., & Kryvoruchko, I. M. (2024). Informatsiina propozytsiia v ahropromyslovii sferi: spetsyfika ta pytannia validatsii ta veryfikatsii [Offer by information in the agro-industrial sphere: specifics and issues of validation and verification]. Istoriia osvity, nauky i tekhniky v Ukraini: mat-ly XIX Vseukr. konf. molod. uchenykh ta spets-iv, (22–23 trav. 2024 r. m. Kyiv). Vinnytsia: TVORY, pp. 202–206 [In Ukrainian].
2. Kurman, T. V. (2014). Ahrosfera yak osnova staloho rozvytku silskohospodarskoho vyrobnytstva [Agrosphere as the basis of sustainable development of agricultural production]. Naukovyi visnyk NUBiP Ukrainy, issue 197, part 2, pp. 48–54 [In Ukrainian].
3. Sozinov, A. A., Shtepa, Yu. N., & Pridatko, V. I. (2004). Agrosfera, kak ob'ekt tselevogo issledovaniya s pomoschyu DZZ i TIS dlya uluchsheniya upravleniya territorialnyim razvitiem i sohraneniem prirodnogo raznoobraziya [The agrosphere as an object of targeted research using remote sensing and TIS to improve the management of territorial development and conservation of natural diversity]. Uchenyie zapiski Tavricheskogo natsionalnogo universiteta. Seriya «Geografiya», vol. 17 (56), no. 2, pp. 72–87 [In Russian].
4. Sozinov, O. O. (2002). Ahrobiotekhnolohii: biosferno-noosfernyi pidkhid [Agrobiotechnologies: biosphere-noosphere approach]. Visnyk NAN Ukrainy, no. 4, pp. 33–39 [In Ukrainian].
5. Medvedev, V. V., & Bulyigin, S. Yu. (1992). K 110-letiyu vyihoda v svet knigi V. V. Dokuchaeva «Nashi stepi prezhde i teper» [On the 110th anniversary of the publication of V. V. Dokuchaev's book «Our Steppes Before and Now»]. Visnyk agrarnoi nauky, no. 4, pp. 53–55 [In Russian].
6. Cherlinka, T.P., & Chaika, V. M. (2012). Ekolohichnyi stan ahrobioriznomanittia Ternopilskoi oblasti [Ecological state of agrobiodiversity of Ternopil region]. Visnyk Sumskoho ahrarnoho universytetu: Ahronomiia i biolohiia. issue 9 (24), pp. 175–178 [In Ukrainian].
7. Butrym, O. V. (2017). Rol ta mistse nyzkovuhletsevoho zemlekorystuvannia u formuvanni systemy zbalansovanoho rozvytku ahrosfery [The role and place of low-carbon land use in the formation of a system of balanced development of the agrosphere]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia, no. 4, pp. 120–125 [In Ukrainian].
8. Kravchuk, V. A. (2018). Syntez tekhniko-tekhnolohichnykh rishen dlia rozkryttia pryrodnykh resursiv ahrosfery [Synthesis of technical and technological solutions for the disclosure of natural resources of the agrosphere]. Tekhnika i tekhnolohii APK, no. 7, pp. 17–20 [In Ukrainian].
9. Khvesyk, M. A., & Sakal, O. V. (2017). Mekhanizmy zberezhennia ahrobioriznomanittia [Mechanisms of preservation of agrobiodiversity]. Ekonomika APK, no. 3, pp. 29–37 [In Ukrainian].
10. Natsionalna dopovid pro stan navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha v Ukraini u 2021 rotsi [National report on the state of the environment in Ukraine in 2021] / Ministerstvo zakhystu dovkillia ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy. 514 p. URL: https://mepr.gov.ua/diyalnist/napryamky/ekologichnyj-monitoryng/natsionalni-dopovidi-pro-stan-navkolyshnogo-pryrodnogo-seredovyshha-v-ukrayini/ [In Ukrainian].
11. Piatyi natsionalnyi zvit Ukrainy pro vykonannia polozhen Konventsii pro bioriznomanittia [The fifth national report of Ukraine on the implementation of the provisions of the Convention on Biodiversity] / Ministerstvo ekolohii ta pryrodnykh resursiv Ukrainy, 2015. URL: https:/www.cbd.int/doc/word/ua/ua–nr-05-uk.pdf [In Ukrainian].
12. Hadzalo, Ya. Vitchyzniane silske hospodarstvo v suchasnykh umovakh: vyklyky ta shliakhy yikh podolannia. [Domestic agriculture in modern conditions: challenges and ways to overcome them]. Dopovid na sesii Zahalnykh zboriv Natsionalnoi akademii ahrarnykh nauk Ukrainy 29 lystopada 2023 r. URL: http://naas.gov.ua/slide/v-tchiznyane-s-lske-gospodarstvo-v-suchasnikh-umovakh-vikliki-ta-shlyakhi-kh-podolannya-dopov-d-prez/ [In Ukrainian].
13. (2021). Mizhnarodna merezha AgroBioNet u realizatsii naukovoi prohramy «Ahrobioriznomanittia dlia polipshennia kharchuvannia, zdorovia ta yakosti zhyttia [The international AgroBioNet network in the implementation of the scientific program «Agrobiodiversity for improving nutrition, health and quality of life»] / S. V. Klymenko, O. V. Hryhorieva, Ya. Brindza ta in. Okhorona bioriznomanittia i istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny v botanichnykh sadakh i dendroparkakh: mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk. konf. (28–30 veres. m. Uman). Journal of Native and Alien Plant Studies, no. 1, pp. 129–135 [In Ukrainian].
14. Yakymchuk, A. Iu. (2016). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm zberezhennia bioriznomanittia Ukrainy u konteksti staloho rozvytku [Organizational and economic mechanism of preservation of biodiversity of Ukraine in the context of sustainable development]: avtoref. dys. ... d-ra ekon. nauk. Lviv [In Ukrainian].
15. Patyka, V. P., Solomakha, V. A., & Burda, R. I. (Eds.) (2003). Perspektyvy vykorystannia, zberezhennia ta vidtvorennia ahrobioriznomanittia v Ukraini [Prospects for the use, preservation and reproduction of agrobiodiversity in Ukraine]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
16. Furdychko,O. I., Drebot, O. S., Demianiuk, O. S., Tkach, E. D., & Bunas, A. A. (2022). Ekolohiia ahrosfery [Agrosphere ecology]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
17. (2005). Ahrobioriznomanittia Ukrainy: teoriia, metodolohiia, indykatory, pryklady [Agrobiodiversity of Ukraine: theory, methodology, indicators, examples]. Part1. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
18. Verhunov, V. A., & Kostiev, V. M. (2002). Kultura zemlerobstva yak faktor tsyviliohenezu [Agricultural culture as a factor of civiliogenesis]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
19. Dudkin, O. V. (Ed.). (2003). Otsinka i napriamky zmenshennia zahroz bioriznomanittiu Ukrainy [Assessment and directions for reducing threats to Ukraine's biodiversity]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].

20.Hardashuk, T. (Ed.). (2003). Zberezhennia biorozmaittia: tradytsii ta suchasnist [Preservation of biodiversity: traditions and modernity]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].

21. Sheliah-Sosonko, Yu. R. (Ed.). (2003). Zberezhennia i nevysnazhlyve vykorystannia bioriznomanittia Ukrainy: stan ta perspektyvy [Preservation and tireless use of biodiversity of Ukraine: state and prospects]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
22. Marushevskyi, H. B., Melnychuk, V. P., & Kostiushyn, V. A. (2008). Zberezhennia bioriznomanittia i stvorennia ekomerezhi [Preservation of biodiversity and creation of an eco-network]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
23. Hrodzynskyi, D. M., Sheliah-Sosonko, Yu. R., & Cherevchenko, T. M. (Ed.). (2001). Problemy zberezhennia ta vidnovlennia bioriznomanittia v Ukraini [Problems of preserving and restoring biodiversity in Ukraine]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
24. Borodina, O. M., Kyryziuk, S. V., & Popova, O. L. (2008). Derzhavna pidtrymka ahrosfery: evoliutsiia problem [State support of the agrosphere: the evolution of the problem]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
25. Popova, O. L. (2009). Stalyi rozvytok ahrosfery Ukrainy [Sustainable development of the agrosphere of Ukraine]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
26. Puzik, V. K., Rozhkov, R. V., & Dolhova, T. A. (Ed.). (2014). Zneshkodzhennia ta utylizatsiia vidkhodiv v ahrosferi [Disposal and disposal of waste in the agrosphere]. Kharkiv [In Ukrainian].
27. Furdychko, O. I. (2014). Ekolohichni osnovy zbalansovanoho rozvytku ahrosfery v konteksti yevropeiskoi intehratsii Ukrainy [Ecological foundations of the balanced development of the agrosphere in the context of the European integration of Ukraine]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
28. Sonko, S. P., Maksymenko, N. V., & Binkovska, H. V. (Ed.). (2015). Ekolohichni osnovy zbalansovanoho pryrodokorystuvannia u ahrosferi [Ecological foundations of balanced nature management in agrosphere]. Kharkiv [In Ukrainian].
29. Lobas, M. H., Rossokha, V. V., & Sokolov, D. O. 92016). Upravlinnia innovatsiino-tekhnolohichnym rozvytkom ahrosfery [Management of innovative and technological development of the agrosphere]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
30. Havrylenko, V. S., Shapoval, V. V., & Polishchuk, I. K. (2015). Metodychni rekomendatsii shchodo zdiisnennia zakhodiv zi zberezhennia stepovoho bioriznomanittia na terytoriiakh obiektiv pryrodno-zapovidnoho fondu Ukrainy [Methodological recommendations for the implementation of measures to preserve steppe biodiversity in the territories of the objects of the Nature Reserve Fund of Ukraine]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
31. Kobenok, H. V., Zakorko, O. P., & Marushevskyi, H. B. (2008). Zberezhennia bioriznomanittia, stvorennia ekomerezhi ta intehrovane upravlinnia richkovymy baseinamy [Preservation of biodiversity, creation of an eco-network and integrated management of river basins]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
32. Slovnyk ahronoma [Agronomist's dictionary]. URL: https://superagronom.com/slovnik- agronoma/agrobioriznomanittya-id18884 [In Ukrainian].
33. Kostiev, V. M., & Puhachov, V. M. (2022). Ekonomichnyi ta sotsiokulturnyi vymir ahrosfery [Economic and socio-cultural dimension of agrosphere]. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].